Relatives' Anguish Regarding Coastal Erosion Endangering Coastal Norfolk Burial Sites
Families of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion argue that a lack of decision on how best to tackle the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their loved ones.
A Looming Threat to Historic Graveyards
Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the coming decades.
A recent report on the situation details a series of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Authorities maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.
“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”
Estimates suggest at least a portion of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.
Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles
A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, including its church and graveyard.
“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing looking for valuables. It’s completely undignified.”
“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”
A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy
Along the coast lies the grave of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.
“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”
She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to exhume existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been attained.”
Searching for Answers and Certainty
The lack of consensus over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.
Some are calling for additional coastal protections to delay the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.
“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”
A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”
He added there was time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”
“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”
The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.